On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 23:50 +0200, Eric Auer wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > SMB/CIFS client would be very nice, it would be nice if it also > > provided some sort of standard TCP/IP implementation as well ... > > The other way round - you need TCP/IP to have a network file system > client like SMB/CIFS. And because a client like Samba would be TSR, > you are right that it would be nice if other clients could re-use > the TCP/IP stack as long as it is in RAM anyway. Yet I still think > that Wattcp is a nice / widespread implementation, maybe it could > be extended to do that re-use thing to save some RAM. I would not > try to save disk space, though: People who run, say, LYNX for DOS > should not be forced to load Samba to make their Lynx work, so I > would still keep the full Wattcp stack in the Lynx binary...
That is what I really meant ... part of the implementation would be a TCP/IP stack that would hopefully usable without loading the upper layers also. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
