"Alain M." wrote: > > I think, you didn't get the point: Reading even the smallest manual > > would always require HTMLHELP then. Yes, you could also use "type" or > > "more", but HTML tag can be very annoying. So I don't like the idea. > > I don't understand why you disagree...
I told you above. > Using HTMLHELP looks like the perfect solution, "some" program has Not to me. > allways to be used, and IMHO this is better then using a text viwer or > an editor I still disagree. > NOTE: the discussion started about OpenWatcom manuals, and that is a > biiig package anyway Of course, reading manuals with hundreds of pages ís no fun, if you don't have hyperlinks or bookmarks, but I was talking about two-page manuals. Robert Riebisch -- BTTR Software http://www.bttr-software.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
