Hi, I would say fdpkg is the more complete package management frontend, so if you want to modify one to make the other obsolete, you should instead add fdupdate functionality to fdpkg ;-). But for me, it is fine to have both fdpkg and fdupdate. The latter could make more use of fdpkg, that would make the fdupdate part simpler so it could focus on other things...
Eric Geraldo wrote: > i would suggest to extend fdupdate as freedos main pkg front end > all we need to do is add the possibility to create local repos > i mean, be able to use cd, floppy or whatever as a repo :) > and of course still use fdpkg and back end... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
