Hi Christian, strange that Lucho would make 4DOS unavailable to non-Chinese?? I do not think the 4DOS license would let him do that...
I agree that JWASM is not bad. On the other hand, even the OpenWatcom compiler does not seem to be open enough for the taste of Fedora, and JWASM is based on OpenWatcom WASM...? Yet Bart Oldeman is quite optimistic about OpenWatcom if I understand his mail of yesterday correctly :-). So yes, while NASM is even more free, JWASM is quite okay for me. > wasn't [the spec] updated to claim NASM and OpenWatcom the main > assembler/compiler? I'm sure I read the previous version which talked > about some (cost-)free MASM-compatible assemblers and Turbo C. You probably mean ArrowASM which can assemble smaller MASM style sources such as for example NANSI. Not great but okay. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
