Hi Japheth, > ... And I think that the "more free"-advantage of Nasm, which you and > Eric did point out is nonsense. That's virtually all my post was about.
As JWASM is "in the same boat" as OpenWatcom, I think it would make sense to try to convince eg Debian / Fedora people that those are free enough to allow calling software compiled with them free, too. Maybe even the licenses can be adjusted... > Probably. But it's not my intention to "advertise" JWasm. For existing MASM code, JWASM is the more free choice. For existing NASM code, of course NASM is :-). Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
