On 02/05/2012 21:29, Georg Potthast wrote: > I agree with Eric. Some additional points: > > You could write a 64bit DOS extender but you would also have to change e.g. > Watcom C or DJGPP to work with a 64bit DOS extender or you cannot write > application programs in C or C++ using 64bit. Also while in 64bit mode you > have no 16bit support so the extender would have to e.g. switch between > modes all the time. > > I ported a subset of Xlib called nano-X to DOS. Based on that I ported FLTK. > This would allow to add a GUI looking like e.g. Windows XP to FreeDOS with > limited effort. It would still be a single-tasking system though. But you > could easily make the desktop and applications based on this run on a Linux > kernel too.
What, you don't use GEM ? :D (On Atari, GEM has become fully multitasking on top of MiNT for ex.) François. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
