Hi again,

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Rugxulo <rugx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, I downloaded shareware versions of RARX 3.93 (32-bit) and old RAR
> 2.50 (16-bit) from Sac.sk. They don't seem compatible. At least, I
> didn't find any obvious way to use the older 2.x compression methods
> with 3.x. So that's a minor annoyance. I did unpack and recompress the
> main Blocek.rar with 2.x, and the difference was quite minor, only
> like 5 kb bigger, IIRC. "-s -ds -r -m5" were the 2.50 switches needed,
> I think, for optimal size.

Just for completeness ...

======================
[ FreeDOS ] G:\TONY>dir *.rar
 Volume in drive G is HalleLU-Jah

 Directory of G:\TONY

BLOCEK_1 RAR       290,263  08-17-12  6:56p
BLOCEK2  RAR       295,923  08-29-12  2:50p
         2 file(s)        586,186 bytes
         0 dir(s)     156,692,480 bytes free

[ FreeDOS ] G:\TONY>arclds *.rar | find /i "files"

   503371    286954  57% 08-17-12 18:57:30       66 files and 2 directories
   503371    292621  58% 08-29-12 14:49:54       66 files and 2 directories

[ FreeDOS ] G:\TONY>history | find /i "-ds"

0014=..\rar a -m5 -s -ds -r ..\blocek2
[ FreeDOS ] G:\TONY>scrndump c:\tmp\rar2.txt
======================

ftp://ftp.sac.sk/pub/sac/pack/rarx393.exe     (672,100 bytes -- 32-bit)
ftp://ftp.sac.sk/pub/sac/pack/rar250.exe       (269,486 bytes -- 16-bit)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to