I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source
compliant.
What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with
software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses
exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available
should be excluded (e.g. Pegasus) but if the source code is freely
available and/or public, yet not explicitly released under the GPL, does
this also suffice for inclusion?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:38 PM, sparky4 <spar...@cock.li> wrote:
> Hmm I am sorry for late reply!!
>
> I will check it out~
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FreeDOS-1-2-package-compilation-tp22618p22903.html
> Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-devel mailing list
> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
