> On Dec 20, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Rugxulo <rugx...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. <jer...@shidel.net> > wrote: >> >> This is the list of the ALL package list for the FDI installer. >> >> Please let me know if I should anything else or remove something. >> >> Also, V8Power Tools is also installed when ALL is selected. >> >> This list includes all packages in the BASE. I just did not include them >> here to >> shorten the list. >> >> ; The remaining packages are only installed when ALL is chosen. >> net\mtcp > >> util\4dos > > (I know some people can't live without this. I just hate the idea that > it somehow taints the whole bunch due to ambiguous license.) > >> util\doslfn > > Which version? 0.41c?
The packages and versions assume just using the ones available on Mateusz’s FreeDOS Package Repository. (repeat for all version questions). The new batch file based FreeDOS Installer (FDI) is finished. It is only waiting on the package lists to be completed. Once that is done, the install media can be assembled and it can go into beta testing. While it is waiting on those lists, I will be adding submitted language translations for the installer. > >> util\fdnpkg > > Presumably latest here? (0.99.4 "<8 hours ago", according to SF.net page) > >> util\memtest > > Uh, you mean Eric's old patched version? Version?? > >> util\bootfix >> util\shsufdrv > > BTW, the licensing is slightly ambiguous here (IMO), but Jason Hood > told me that it's "zlib". > >> util\cwsdpmi > > Please make sure r7 only (although including both r5 2008 and r7 > wouldn't be the worst idea, but I seriously don't know of any obvious > reason to do that). > >> archiver\zip > > 2.32? (I still don't know why we never "officially" had 3.00, not that > it majorly matters.) > >> archiver\unzip > > 6.00? > >> ; Some packages I would like to see in ALL. >> util\grep > > Xgrep? (No LFNs, no *nix globbing, but it's very small!) > > http://freedos.sourceforge.net/software/?prog=xgrep > >> archiver\tar > > Which? ("UTIL" does include an ancient 16-bit one.) > > http://freedos.sourceforge.net/software/?prog=tar > >> archiver\gzip > > Which? (I'm assuming only the old 16-bit one and not the 386+ DJGPP build.) > > http://freedos.sourceforge.net/software/?prog=gzip > >> archiver\bz2 > > (386+ DJGPP only) > > http://freedos.sourceforge.net/software/?prog=bzip2 > >> devel\nasm > > Which? Latest is 2.11.08. > > http://freedos.sourceforge.net/software/?prog=nasm > http://www.nasm.us/ > >> devel\fpc > > 3.0.0 was released recently, but there is no "package" for it yet. It > would be quite large (which is annoying), but perhaps LZMA (which > Mateusz dislikes) would mitigate that. > >> net\wget > > Michael Kostylev made a (slightly) newer version semi-recently, but I > have no idea if he included all patches or not (as things like that > are a pain to rebuild). So I'm not honestly sure if 1.11 is that much > worse than 1.12 (and certainly the latter is much larger). (He also > rebuilt Curl, but I have the same worries. I may just mirror them to > iBiblio anyways, lacking any direct proof of error.) > > http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/board_entry.php?id=14569 > >> net\rsync > > Dunno if that's even available, can't remember, never tried it. EDIT: > Here's what we seem to have (but it's not officially listed under > "NET", apparently): > > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/net/rsync/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
