Hi Eric,
> it is correct that I have once compiled a version of FIND, > but I have yet not found time to find out what *changes* > the updated code snippet by Tom provides. Because I would > be interested to understand what originally was wrong :-) was detailed in the mail :-< > Of course, if somebody else wants to compile FIND with the > updated code, it would be just as good. it's not (I can easily do that) but this should be compiled. put into a package, go to ibiblio, ... i.e. maintainer stuff > As mentioned earlier, > compilation with Turbo C (NOT Turbo C++ and not OpenWatcom C) > has the advantage of creating a SMALL binary for FIND, which > is good when you want to put it on a classic tool floppy disk. > Maybe Tom could mail a diff -u to illustrate his patch here? I NEVER do things that you can do exactly as easy as I. the full source was in the mail. In fact you can do it even easier as I have no diff around. Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
