I was thinking why not to use btrfs on implementation source code. I think it’s possible. With btrfs we can use large hdd or ssd disks.
Kind Regards, Pedro Dias Vicente On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 11:23, Eric Auer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! Some interesting detail from BTTR - makes me wonder > whether FreeDOS kernel, FORMAT, DOSFSCK or some subset > of the three are mistaken here. What does Microsoft say? > > Regards, Eric > > PS: You read that right. A DOS RAMDISK with > 32 GB size :-D > > > > https://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=18909 > > another bug in doslfn (Announce) > > posted by jadoxa, Queensland, Australia, 26.03.2022, 08:49 > > > Btw, something about the dosfsck.exe tool: if it's been run to check the > > FAT32 ramdisk, it wants to "cure" the content of the FS-info and > BS-backup > > sectors. Obviously it isn't happy with the sector numbers -1 as set > by the > > ramdisk. > > FreeDOS: if the info & backup sectors are -1 don't use 'em. > dosfsck: if the info & backup sectors are 0 don't use 'em. > > Oh, goody. New version of rdrvsx32 with valid info & backup sectors. A > size < 100 is assumed gibibyte, otherwise mebibyte. You can also have a > drive bigger than 32GiB (that was previously an implicit limit, 64Ki FAT > sectors). > > http://adoxa.altervista.org/shsufdrv/rdrvsx32.zip > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
