Hi, > On Sep 1, 2022, at 7:44 PM, Jim Hall <jh...@freedos.org> wrote: > > Those 8.3 DOS filenames can be limiting for package names, so I like > the idea of moving the DJGPP packages to DJ_xxxxx instead of DJGPP_xx. > I saw your note on GitLab about this, too. > > If you're also rebuilding the DJGPP packages (newer version?) you > might rename the packages to something like this: > > djgpp_bn (DJGPP binutils) ==> dj_bin > djgpp_bs (DJGPP Bison) ==> dj_bison > djgpp_db (DJGPP gdb) ==> dj_gdb > djgpp_fq (DJGPP faq) ==> dj_faq > djgpp_fx (DJGPP Flex) ==> dj_flex > djgpp_gc (DJGPP gcc) ==> dj_gcc > djgpp_gp (DJGPP gpp) ==> dj_gpp > djgpp_mk (DJGPP make) ==> dj_make > djgpp_ob (DJGPP Objective-C compiler) ==> dj_objc > djgpp_rh (DJGPP rhide) ==> dj_rhide > djgpp_tx (DJGPP Texinfo) ==> dj_txinf > djgpp (DJGPP environment) ==> djgpp [keep the same] > > Those names make more sense to me. > > Jerome just released the T2209 test build, but maybe this could be > added to the T2210 test build?
I’ll go ahead and implementing the new DJGPP package naming scheme. While not difficult, there are several steps involved with renaming packages and it will take a few minutes. :-) Jerome _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
