Hello Ben, Both links give me a 404, maybe a problem with pasting?
Aitor On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 18:21, Ben Collver <bencoll...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Bret Johnson wrote: > > > > > For purposes we're discussing here, I don't think DOSBox (or any of its > > > forks, including vDOS) is a viable solution. > > > > > > DOSBox really isn't DOS. It's an environment designed to run certain > > > DOS applications. A lot of stuff is missing in DOSBox that's needed to > > > make it a "real enough" DOS to be used for development and testing. > > > E.g., a lot of the internal structures that some DOS "extenders" need to > > > look at (like certain TSRs and Device Drivers) simply don't exist on > > > DOSBox. > > You can install FreeDOS in DOSBox. See the links below for more details. > In my experience qemu and VirtualBox are not really geared toward > supporting DOS and they have annoying BIOS bugs that are not present in > DOSBox. So while FreeDOS runs more quickly in qemu and VirtualBox, it runs > more accurately in DOSBox-X. > > > https://dosbox-x.com/wiki/Guide%253ADOS-Installation-in-DOSBox%25E2%2580%2590X > > > https://dosbox-x.com/wiki/Guide%253AManaging-image-files-in-DOSBox%25E2%2580%2590X > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
