Hi!
4-Апр-2004 20:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> te> btw: there is absolutely no need to mess with them - they usually work.
>> "they"="BC"? It depends. :)
BB> 'they' = '(your changed) batchfiles'
2Bernd: thank you.
2tom: original batch files _almost_ work, but with troubles. Eg, I was
_forced_ to change BC5.MAK, because my TLIB placed _not_ to directory, where
other BC binaries are placed. I was _forced_ to change wlinker.bat, because
input redirection doesn't works for batch files (for me wlink called through
batch file). When I was use original batch files, then I was don't know if
processing was successful or aborted. And I was forced to use option -r for
build.bat after change in options (CPU or FAT support) or compiler to
properly recompile kernel. I think, all of this is sufficient to update
batch and make files to make them better.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
