Bart, >> However LFN seems to be ~12-16 K code; should this ever go into some >> (conditional compiled?) kernel this might be a problem
BO> How did you get this estimate? As far as I can see the WITHLFNAPI part of BO> inthndlr.c is about 150 bytes; lfnapi.c takes up 1K. And the rest was BO> going to go into a TSR. But then we haven't heard from Victor for a long BO> time... If I would do it (I won't), I would integrate it directly into the kernel, without any TSR/interface/API/... hassles. and then this must fit into the HMA/INIT group also. The 12-16K estimate comes from looking at DOSLFN and LFNDOS. Both use ~16K code to implement LFN. integrate this into the kernel should avoid some duplicate code, so I estimate it could be done in ~12K. >> d) I find handling 2 different segments easier then one combined, >> inparticular in .MAP files. BO> I still have two different segments in the map file, just one group :) OK. tom ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
