Hi!
24-Апр-2004 17:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> recompilation, up to 20 with OW). Probably, I should force my efforts in
>> optimization of makefile (collect names of changed files in one file, then
>> pass this list at once for compilation).
BO> if you want to check things quickly, simply do
BO> wcc -i..\hdr -os -r -s -j -d1 -DWITHFAT32 foo.c
BO> (perhaps via some batch file)
I do so for BC (with -S option). :) Ask again: how you get listings for
inthndlr.c? When I dsiasm it, then second half of listing was not contain
sources (desyncronization?).
BO> wcc (wpp neither) can't compile multiple files at the sametime. You can
______________O\_/_________________________________\_/O______________
fc=<file_name>
(C++ only) specify file of command lines to be batch processed (see
fc=<file_name>)
_____________________________________________________________________
O/~\ /~\O
BO> only try to decrease the load time of wcc.exe Maybe compressing it or
BO> binding with a dos extender helps. Maybe not.
Hm. May be try the 32lite exepacker? Though, don't sure if this help
(much) - WCC already runs from Stacker volume.
BO> wpp is not good -- the kernel is written in C, not C++, and some small
BO> differences like sizeof('a') (1 in C++, sizeof(int) in C) maybe
BO> responsible for what you see.
? I not use WPP with kernel (yet). Also, should be unimportant by which
compiler compiled compiler, if its sources are valid.
BO> It's also bigger so just slows things down.
Yes, WPP is 50% longer. :(
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg297
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel