Hi!
8-Сен-2004 15:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> Hi, you probably found a bug then: I am sure the intention was
EA> to replace the freedos-specific function by int 2f.122f...
No, if this is bug, then this is bug only in history.txt. Also, no one
was says about replacing FD specific function. As I understand, Lucho was
adds INT2F/122F only by your pressure.
EA> It would affect int 21.30 result, not int 21.3306 result, and
If I right remember, Lucho's patch affect os_major and os_minor. Thus,
yes, there _is_ bug (same as bug with VERSION= in config.c), because should
be affected os_setver_major and os_setver_minor. Probably, *_major and
*_minor should be renamed to os_major/os_true_major and
os_minor/os_true_minor, to make less confusions later.
Anyway, I think, INT2F/122F should be removed _or_ it should replace FD
specific function (INT 21/33FC).
EA> I hope that it actually works ;-).
PS: I return this topic back to group, because it may be interested for
others.
PPS: Eric, you often move threads from groups to private email. Please, do
this only for topics, which is interested only for private persons.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idP47&alloc_id808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
