Hi!
12-Сен-2004 13:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Show this, please.
LG> See it in the CVS, along with the nice additions of Eduardo.
CVS isn't accesible for me.
>> Let me ask reverse question: why you add this _another FreeDOS specific
>> function, which duplicates another specific function_, whereas only some
>> version probably support this function (and RBIL is not very clear how!).
LG> It's not FreeDOS-specific. It's MS-DOS 4.0 specific. And some software
LG> uses it.
Why then you not add other-DOSes-specific functions? For example,
"INT21/20: S/DOS 1.0+ & PTS-DOS 6.51+ - GET OEM REVISION"? Or INT21/92?
"Some" software also use these functions.
In case of INT2F/122F "some" software mean mythical Matthias' FREEVER,
which noone of us seen it, and it even unknown if this function need for
FREEVER at all.
LG> Don't ask me more.
Lucho, you introduce change in interface. _Such_ actions necessarily
_must_ be discussed and approved. So "don't ask me more" is not in given
case.
>> Now your patches mention GPL (which associated with GPL1)
LG> No, GPL means *current* version, and the URL points to it.
URL is reduced for convenience, but for law clarity (for which you at
all mention license) you should mention complate license name. Explicitly.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
