Hi Tom,
Alain>>I agree :)Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
Hi!
4-ÐÐÐ-2005 19:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fix divide error message text +++ entry.asm 4 Jan 2005 19:05:08 -0000 1.27.2.2 -; print a message 'Interrupt divide by zero' +; print a message 'Interrupt divide error'
This is not fix, this is change - though "division by zero" interrupt INT0 hapens not only in case of real division by zero, but this ("Divide by Zero") is a standard name. On the other side, "Interrupt divide error" I read as "error in dividing the interrupt", so, if you wish to give more meaningful name, there should be something like "Interrupt: division error".
Tom> I disagree :(
I don't understand why, for curiosityÅ sake only: "interrupt divide error" in english is ambigouous and can be interpreted in two ways.
Anyway, I vote for the exact MS-DOS message for compatibility.
Alain
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
