Ok, great. I did set up a development project.

The only missing thing is a good benchmark tool with no destruction of 
data. Anything to be recommend? At best a command line one where we can 
redirect the output to a file.


Eric Auer schrieb:
> Hi!
>> Indeed... Your purpose is nice but from writing it's to
>> complicated to become useful for anyone.
> Okay, trying to be simpler... :-)
> USB sticks are made with flash chips that are good at big
> sequential access, in particular small writes are very slow.
> You can check for example the benchmark here:
> http://preview.tinyurl.com/5tsx4o
> Which is mentioned in the forum thread here:
> www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=34372
> Because of that, I suggest to make access blocks larger.
> Would be nice if somebody can give it a try. Both the
> "USB stick with DOS driver" and the "USB stick supported
> by BIOS" (eg booting from USB stick) case are interesting.
> For possible read speed gains, try this:
> lbacache flop
> tickle /lba /chs
> (if it helps, we can tune tickle further: current setting
> is "increase 4k aligned below 2k blocks to 4k" but any block
> size up to 8k and any alignment can be set at compile time)
> For possible write speed gains, try the DR DOS cache:
> nwcache 6144 6144 /lend=off /bl=16 /delay=333 /w=64 /flush=off
> (options mean: 6 MB 16 kB low RAM lookahead 1/3 sec 64 kB delayed)
> You can get lbacache here:
> www.coli.uni-saarland.de/~eric/stuff/soft/
> (lbacache-2008apr07.zip recommended, includes tickle)
> You can get nwcache here:
> ...coli.../~eric/nwcache-binary.zip (as above)
> For a more official download go here:
> ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/OpenDOS/DR-DOS.703/ (images/ or self extracting)
> Note that DR DOS 7.03 is sort of shareware: Free
> for noncommercial use and / or 90 day evaluation.
> The EDR DOS project is possibly more free but it
> only the minimum files without most extra tools.
> NWCACHE is on disk02.144 (in the exe and in images/...) disk image.
> So... If you have some USB flash disk, it would be
> cool if you could find out whether lbacache+tickle
> or nwcache improve speed compared to "default setup"
> (lbacache without tickle, or uide cache for example).
> Thanks!
> Eric

This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
Freedos-user mailing list

Reply via email to