Hi, On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Alain Mouette <ala...@pobox.com> wrote: > (top posting to make it shorter) > > I do need as much conventional memory as I can get, and even the it is a > tight fit... > > So everyone belives that > JEMM386 X=TEST NOEMS > is safer? if so, I will change...
My point was that ACPI tables (and/or too aggressive searching by FD [J]EMM386?) makes it necessary to either avoid X= I= or use both with "=TEST". At least, from my limited experience, that's the case. It's worth a try, at least, but who knows honestly. :-P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
