On 7/6/2012 12:25 PM, C. Masloch wrote:
> I agree, I'm certainly overly pedantic and unreasonable and silly.
> And you're the one using the term "intellectual property" as if that was a
> coherent concept.
> =)

I guess I don't understand that last message either.  The purpose of all 
of these licenses is to protect the thought that goes into the code, and 
that is commonly recognized as intellectual property.

You are willing to argue the finer points of each license and how it 
restricts the usage of the code (read: intellectual property), but do 
you mean to imply here that intellectual property is not a coherent concept?

If so, why be pedantic over something that is not coherent?

On that note,  I'm going back to playing with my intellectual property.  
Sorry ..  I meant code ...


Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Freedos-user mailing list

Reply via email to