BitBucket is another option. I haven't used it personally but I believe Maarten
has, so he is better suited to answer any questions which may arise about how
it differs from GitHub.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, August 27, 2020 12:03 AM, Jim Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know of any source code client like git or svn for DOS or FreeDOS.
> But I haven't looked recently.
>
> My recommendation is to put it on GitHub. I used to have a GitHub, but I
> never used it, so I deleted my account. But now that I have new project stuff
> that I want to keep working on and collaborate on, I'm planning to create a
> new GitHub account and put my stuff there.
>
> I like the ability to organize your stuff a little easier on GitHub, compared
> to Sourceforge. I like the svn repo on Sourceforge and I have stuff hosted
> there, but I'm thinking my newer, bigger stuff will probably go on GitHub.
>
> To migrate, I recommend doing it a bit at a time. Take an afternoon and just
> focus on one project. Migrate the code, commit, label, verify - then migrate
> the next version, repeat. Then spend a different day/afternoon to focus on
> another project, until you're done.
>
> Jim
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 2:22 PM Eric Auer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> I had a thought about my more or LESS working website
>> which has all those ZIPs of freedos and other packages:
>>
>> It would probably be more modern and not require any
>> website on my own to put all that on one of those modern
>> portals where people can browse sources and fetch and
>> submit changes, right?
>>
>> How compatible are such websites with DOS binaries? Do
>> they have the possibility to do automated compiles for
>> users of source versions selected by the users etc.? I
>> do not intend to port anything to a new compiler, just
>> asking :-)
>>
>> Which website of that type do you people recommend?
>>
>> And would anybody feel like grabbing my zips, throwing
>> all the contens on such a site and then give me a sign
>> so I can open some type of virtual inbox in case people
>> have feedback about any of the packages now provided
>> as dusty static zips?
>>
>> If you think this is a sign of me being very lazy: That
>> might be true. But on the other hand, it is also an offer
>> to provide support in a more modern way as soon as some
>> "time donor" has put the files on the platform for me :-)
>>
>> See https://auersoft.eu/soft/ for the pile of zips here.
>> They are not that many PACKAGES, but often many VERSIONS.
>>
>> https://auersoft.eu/soft/ those obviously are not BY me
>> at all, but many zips are versions that I HAVE patched.
>>
>> https://auersoft.eu/soft/specials/ those tend to be by
>> me, but too off-topic to be close to the distro. Still:
>>
>> Fdshield, moresys, runtime, metakern and some smaller
>> tools for use with installer scripts may have crossed
>> your paths already :-)
>>
>> https://auersoft.eu/soft/specials/ features a single 2.88
>> MB floppy image version of an old DOS distro by Rugxulo,
>> pcisleep (which also does LSPCI stuff), a pre-compiled
>> German freecom command.com, getargs for MEMDISK and some
>> other obscure things. Even some old ctmouse test area.
>>
>> As you see, everything there is at least 10 years old.
>> Yet I think there are quite a few useful packages :-)
>>
>> Let me know that you think... Thank you!
>>
>> Regards, Eric
>>
>> PS: Maybe I should have used freedos-devel, but I think
>> there are more people on -user and you do not need to be
>> a devel to feel like helping by uploading or commenting.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freedos-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
