Hi,

I have two CF adapters. A front side floppy size Startech one in an Athlon XP 
system that had an AsRock VIA motherboard until
a few days ago when I upgraded it to an EPoX nForce 2 motherboard. Then I have 
another chinese one that is mounted
on the back in an extension bracket on an IBM Aptiva P200 MMX with an Ali 
motherboard. I have never had any problem with
any of these 3 motherboards. I have three kinds of CF cards. One 32Gb Sandisk 
that I use for FreeBSD and earlier for Windows 
XP and Arch Linux 32 on the Athlon, one 1Gb brandless one that came with an 
ALIX 2D3 that I use for FreeDOS on both PCs and a 
bunch of 2Gb and 4Gb Apacer ones for DR-DOS, MS-DOS, Windows NT 4 and Windows 
95 on the Aptiva. All work fine on any 
combination. Note that microdrives also work in CF adapters but these are 3000 
and some RPMs. So they are very slow.

If I need a swap file, I'll just put it on a regular hard drive. I use a cheap 
Silicon Image SATA PCI card in the Aptiva
and use it with a 160Gb hard drive from a laptop I upgraded to an SSD. Works 
great in NT4 and I can put the swap file on 
there. I have two 320Gb hard drives in RAID 1 with a 3ware 8006-@LP in the 
Athlon XP system and would just put the swap file 
on there if I needed one.

You won't run into any removable bit problems unless you install something 
newer than NT4. Usually cards that don't have
the removable bit set are those advertised as "Industrial". Windows XP will 
install without complaining on a CF with the 
removable bit set but some dumb software can refuse to install because of it. 
Linux and FreeBSD do not care whether the 
removable bit is set or not. No DOS family OS cares about that either. None of 
the BIOSes I used with the CF adapters
treat the CF differently than a hard drive but I think that has more to do with 
the CF adapter than with the CF cards.

Be warned that up to date Linux is bitrotting hard on 32 bit machines. I used 
to have Arch Linux 32 on the Athlon system and 
besides the problem of a lot of software throwing SIGILL because they are 
compiled with SSE2 instructions, the kernel is 
pretty unstable too last I checked. A lot of Linux people being paid by big 
corporations don't give a shit about testing on 
older hardware. I have since moved to FreeBSD which still works great on 32bit. 
Also up to date Linux will mostlikely not work 
with anything less than 128 Mb of RAM without X.


_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to