> On Apr 10, 2021, at 7:03 PM, Michael Brutman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Jerome, > > In the grand scheme of things it is not a big deal and it has been wrong for > years. > > Thanks for taking care of it. If it does remain then Rugxulo should consider > updating the parts of mTCP (and anything else) that was repackaged for use in > FDNet.
When DOS was still my primary OS, networking wasn’t really a thing. Sure, I had a fax/modem and connected via dial-up to a couple BBS and eventually even the Internet. But as for actual networking, I didn’t see much of that until late Win3.11. That’s more or less to say... I’m no DOS networking expert. Rugxulo originally did some network card detection and network configuration in his MetaDOS side project. FDNET was based on his work in MetaDOS But, he was not directly involved with or responsible for FDNET. I don’t expect he will be interested in improving the package. Actually, I’ve asked several times if anyone was interested in taking over FDNET to make improvements and maybe increase hardware support. But, no one has ever shown any interest in doing that. So, IDK if it’s even worth updating the FDNET license and resolving any other issues. Or, just drop it completely. Jerome _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
