> while the ability to provide ISA-like DMA for PCI (e.g. sound cards)
> or PCIe basically vanished at least 10 years ago, I am less pessimistic
> about BIOS services. Can you give specific examples of too stripped
> down BIOSes in recent mainboards?

Recent is probably relative here - it has been a good few years since I
have tried this - I think around 2016 or so.

> Thanks for the NUC warning, but Win98 actually will switch from BIOS
> to built-in drivers which are likely not able to cope with new chips.

That's what I thought too, but I figured it would at least run in
compatibility mode and IIRC the BIOS had options to run the SATA
interface in IDE-compatibility mode so I figured my chances were good
but alas no.

> How about classic DOS on the NUC? Which DOS apps locked up on which
> other PC as you have mentioned above, trying to use which features?

It has been quite a few years so my memory is hazy but I've only bought
Intel boards for quite a few years now so it would've been their UEFI
implementation.  I definitely remember the NUC - when I ran the Windows
98 installer it said "Detecting hardware" just after the DOS prompt and
then froze.  I played around with it quite a bit but was unable to get
it to progress beyond that point.  I guess I could've tried installing
it on another PC then transferring it to the NUC and updating drivers
but I imagine that would've raised a whole bunch of other issues.

I'm really struggling to remember the other issues I had.  I seem to
remember getting disk corruption when I was playing around with it.  I
think I had booted off USB and was trying to run the installer off
that, so I tried making a small ~1GB partition on the internal disk and
copying the installer across but the files didn't copy properly or
something because I seem to remember the installer coming up with error
messages about corrupted files.  I might be misremembering the details,
but I just recall thinking that after everything I tried, I was
surprised I could get a test Windows 7 installer to run properly on it
as I thought the unit was faulty and I'd have to return it.  Linux also
installed on it just fine which is what I ended up running on it.

It's made me wary of using DOS on modern machines so it was quite
enlightening joining this group and finding out that there are still
modern machines that will run DOS properly, and my experience was
apparently an uncommon one.

I do like the NUC though and I found that some of their older models
list Win98 as supported so I am on the lookout for those models, but
even second-hand ones go for surprisingly high prices where I am, and
people seem happy with them as they don't come up for sale very often.

Cheers,
Adam.


_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to