Hi, that sounds great! I was planning to try HX RT. Thanks for the update.

On Mon 7. 6. 2021 at 3:39, Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de> wrote:

>
> Hi :-)
>
> I would like to refresh the discussion about 1.3 updates...
>
> *Part one, quick driver selection improvements*
>
> Questions about the next update of the 1.3 boot media,
> has the following already been taken care of? Thanks!
>
>  - provide XMGR as alternative for HIMEM at least in "full"
>    (it can have better compatibility than HIMEM or JEMMEX)
>
>  - provide CTMOUSE 2.0 as alternative for 2.1 in "full"
>    (one uses BIOS, the other hardware I/O for PS/2 and
>    USB legacy support can be broken in one of the two)
>
>  - move UIDE from "base" to "full"...
>    (UIDE is more for people who want tiny boot disks)
>
>  - ...while moving UHDD from "bonus" to "base"!
>    (UHDD and UDVD2 together give best performance)
>
>  - ...and moving LBACACHE from "base" to "full"
>    (CDRCACHE already is "full"-only, but see below!)
>
> The rationale for the latter is the following: If you want
> to cache both harddisk/SSD and CD/DVD, you will either have
> to load both LBACACHE and CDRCACHE, or have to load UHDD
> before UDVD2. Because using UHDD allows sharing cache XMS
> between harddisk and CD, that is the more modern method.
>
> Note that only UDVD2 uses UHDD cache. In every situation
> where the ELTORITO driver is used, I recommend loading
> CDRCACHE for ELTORITO. So the BOOT CONFIGURATION of the
> installer should be able to use both: UHDD+UDVD2 in one
> setting and ELTORITO+CDRCACHE in the other. Note how the
> two styles differ in which part must be loaded first.
>
> See my 3 May 2021 mailS "Distro autoexec/config wishes"
> which also discusses some other config issues.
>
> In case Lukas is reading this: You can also use CDRCACHE
> with OAKCDROM, but let me know if that breaks your game
> copy protection checks! Also note that some games need
> to use XMS below the 16 MB boundary. Both XMS drivers
> and some XMS-using drivers such as UHDD and RDISK have
> command line options to keep "low" XMS free for games.
>
> Of course it would also be fine to have more drivers
> in "base", but if only either UIDE or UHDD can be in
> there, then it should be UHDD, not UIDE or LBACACHE.
>
> *Part two, slower package choice suggestions*
>
> Can we promote HX RT / HX GUI more? It runs Win32 apps.
> If you are okay with the license, please include it.
>
> Can we promote XFDISK next to FDISK? "Upgrade" XFDISK
> from "Bonus CD only" to "full" or even "base" for that.
>
> Can we add INFOPLUS (COMPINFO tends to crash) as "MSD"?
>
> Can we promote DOSZIP (and DN2?) as "DOSSHELL"?
> Lukas' 2 June mail says DN2 is slower etc.?
>
> Can we promote DOS32A as cure for DOS4GW problems?
>
> Can we add the MPXPLAY media player, with AC97 and HDA
> support, great to show off support for modern hardware!
>
> Please add FDSHIELD to "full" or even "base" again,
> it is our resident (TSR) virus protection thingy :-)
>
> Please add RDISK next to SRDISK: While the latter
> is resizeable, the former is very lightweight.
>
> In general, the Legacy CD is missing a number of things
> compared to the Live CD (aka Full CD?) or the Full USB
> medium. I would give all three the same set of packages
> and make Lite USB less lite (at least 60 MB FAT16) but
> you already know my issues with too small USB media.
>
> As people have to burn a CD anyway, Legacy need not be
> Lite, but if you want to offer a Lite CD, you could
> offer one with Legacy and one non-Legacy boot style:
> The ISO would be small enough so you can offer both.
>
> I remember people have also missed RAREAD and RAWRITE.
> Which other packages should be move to higher categories?
>
> Maybe ARJ and CABEXTRACT? Command and freecom probably
> are not REALLY "less included" on various media?
>
> And why are LHA and UNRAR not included at all?
> Any license problems I have overlooked?
>
>
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.3/previews/1.3-rc4/report.html
>
> Thanks for looking into those :-) Regards, Eric
>
>
>
> PS: I would have included 386SWAT (debugger) and DPMIONE
> (DPMI host for DOS extenders etc.) but those are closed
> source: http://www.sudleyplace.com/download.htm Still
> cool enough to mention in this mail ;-)
>
> PS: Does ANY of you know contexts where CTMOUSE 1.9.1
> works, while 2.1 would not, even when the mouse wheel
> mode of 2.1 is not activated via command line option?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to