>> in addition, neither I nor you know if 'CTTY NUL' works on MSDOS 3.0 > The original requirement was MSDOS <3.30. > I tested with MSDOS 3.21 and it worked. > Test with MSDOS 3.0 was okay too. correcting myself, CTTY NUL probably always worked, from MSDOS 1.0, as MSDOS was supposed (I never tested) to be able to run on a serial terminal. so CTTY COM1 would redirect input and output to COM1. and you could move the cursor on the screen (and other stuff) using ESCape sequences. ANSI.SYS was used to simulate this (I think a VT100 terminal) on the CGA display, so software could be written that would work 'everywhere'. Tom _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Travis Siegel
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Travis Siegel
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Jerome Shidel
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Jerome Shidel
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Robert Riebisch
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Joao Silva
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO userbeitrag
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Bob Pryor
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO tom ehlert
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Robert Riebisch
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO tom ehlert
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Liam Proven
- [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Jose Senna
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Bret Johnson
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Jerome Shidel
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO tom ehlert
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Bret Johnson
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Jerome Shidel
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Bret Johnson
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO tom ehlert
- Re: [Freedos-user] ECHO vs @ECHO Liam Proven