Well said. :)



Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Sunday, March 17th, 2024 at 8:57 PM, Ben Collver via Freedos-user 
<freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:26:05 +0100
> > From: tom ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de
> > To: "Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS."
> > freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Coding in BASIC for Freedos?
> > 
> > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 6:26 AM Liam Proven via Freedos-user
> > > freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > 
> > > > There are good reasons that DOS went away some 35 years ago. It has
> > > > its uses but not being able to flip to another window or another
> > > > screen to consult documentation, or try something out, or look it up
> > > > online, is a massive handicap.
> > 
> > +1
> 
> 
> This is an example of limited imagination. In this day and age it is
> common for people to use their phone to take a photo of an error message
> for troubleshooting. The idea that someone is stuck on a single
> dedicated computer in a vacuum without any other technology available
> is very retro indeed. It can be both, or something in between, or just
> for fun.
> 
> Even when DOS was still commercially produced, professional developers
> often preferred to do their development on another operating system.
> Many classic DOS games were developed using more powerful systems.
> This includes originals like Zork. They used DOS as their runtime.
> 
> But before they became professional developers, while they were still
> learning, they probably used all kinds of gross technologies, and
> wrote shoddy code, and probably had fun along the way.
> 
> > Nope. AFAICT it's a person wanting to learn programming; no mentioning of
> > FreeDOS.
> 
> 
> If it isn't FreeDOS related, then is it off-topic on this mailing list?
> 
> There's a lot of snobbery in the programming world. A famous expert
> declared that students who learned to program on BASIC were ruined
> forever. It's all too easy to debate a dead person, but i would
> respond "Whew! Now the pressure is off." Since i am ruined forever
> as a programmer, now i get to have fun. I don't have to take myself
> too seriously.
> 
> > I fail to see the advantage.
> 
> 
> Your failure of imagination is not helping this person.
> 
> If i were wanting to tinker with BASIC on DOS, I'd probably start
> with QBASIC.EXE because there has been so much written about it.
> Once i got the hang of that, then i'd graduate to something free.
> 
> Here are some links. I hope they help.
> 
> BASIC Techniques And Utilities Book:
> http://ethanwiner.com/fullmoon.html
> 
> 
> Programmed Lessons in QBasic
> https://chortle.ccsu.edu/QBasic/index.html
> 
> 
> QB Express Magazine & Tutorials
> http://www.petesqbsite.com/sections/express/express.shtml
> 
> 
> QBasic 1.1 Web-based, runs in a web browser
> https://archive.org/details/msdos_qbasic_megapack
> 
> 
> QBasic 1.1 Download
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20060101175728/
> http://download.microsoft.com/download/
> win95upg/tool_s/1.0/W95/EN-US/olddos.exe>
> 
> 
> -Ben
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to