Eric Auer wrote: >That makes perfect sense to me. FreeCOM is welcome to make >use of 286 optimizations given that PC which have sensible >amounts of XMS available must be PC which have 286+ CPU. FreeCOM does not need "sensible" amounts of XMS to swap. 150k is enough. Besides, an 8086 PC might very well have a few megs of XMS, there is technically nothing that strictly prevents it. It is just uncommon. Mateusz _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
- [Freedos-user] XMS on a 8086 Mateusz Viste via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on a 8086 E. C. Masloch via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on a 80... Eric Auer via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on ... Mateusz Viste via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS... Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user... Mateusz Viste via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-... Michael Brutman via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on ... E. C. Masloch via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on a 8086 Mateusz Viste via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on a 80... tsiegel--- via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on ... tom ehlert via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS... tom ehlert via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS on ... Ralf Quint via Freedos-user
- Re: [Freedos-user] XMS... Christopher Evans via Freedos-user