On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:53 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan <laa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Patchset looks reasonable to me, from a quick look. Testing a22x >> isn't so easy without resurrecting an ancient downstream kernel for >> old snadragon devices, so I think it is ok to ignore that. If the > > Do you mean: > > - try to keep supporting a22x on best-effort basis by providing fallback > behavior where uncertain, or > > - ignore a22x completely and evolve the driver to a20x?
try to keep on best-effort basis, but it shouldn't block anything.. there was someone who was upstreaming kernel support for apq8060, so I hope that when we eventually have drm/msm support for a2xx it will be once again possible to test a22x. BR, -R >> rnndb bits are merged already, then: > > I'd swear those bits were merged in rnndb, but they aren't! > So the commit id in 1/8 was wrong all the time. > > Pushed as: b8fb7978e7ae106d0d11d0b238ab2ba2d4dd9d43. > >> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> > > Thanks! > > Regards, > Wladimir _______________________________________________ Freedreno mailing list Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno
