On 24/06/2023 15:48, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 24/06/2023 03:41, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>> Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suij...@somainline.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
>> index a43e11d3b00d..60b590f21138 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
>>         - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm
>>         - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290
>>         - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660
>> +      - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125
> 
> Should we start using standard scheme, so "qcom,sm6125-dsi-phy-14nm" ?

I guess the earlier the better.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to