Em Fri, 10 May 2024 13:39:17 +0300 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org> escreveu:
> On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 13:09, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 10 May 2024, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Em Fri, 10 May 2024 11:08:38 +0300 > > > Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> escreveu: > > > > > >> On Thu, 09 May 2024, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > The drm/msm driver had adopted using Python3 script to generate > > >> > register > > >> > header files instead of shipping pre-generated header files. Document > > >> > the minimal Python version supported by the script. > > >> > > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org> > > >> > --- > > >> > Documentation/process/changes.rst | 1 + > > >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > >> > > > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/process/changes.rst > > >> > b/Documentation/process/changes.rst > > >> > index 5685d7bfe4d0..8d225a9f65a2 100644 > > >> > --- a/Documentation/process/changes.rst > > >> > +++ b/Documentation/process/changes.rst > > >> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ cpio any cpio > > >> > --version > > >> > GNU tar 1.28 tar --version > > >> > gtags (optional) 6.6.5 gtags --version > > >> > mkimage (optional) 2017.01 mkimage --version > > >> > +Python (optional) 3.5.x python3 --version > > >> > > >> Python 3.5 reached end-of-life 3½ years ago [1]. What's the point in > > >> using anything older than the oldest supported version of Python, > > >> i.e. 3.8 at this time? > > > > > > What's the point of breaking compilation with on older distros? > > > The idea of minimal versions here is to specify the absolute minimum > > > version that it is required for the build to happen. If 3.5 is > > > the minimal one, then be it. > > > > AFAICT 3.5 was an arbitrary rather than a deliberate choice. We should > > at least be aware *why* we'd be sticking to old versions. > > From my side, the 3.5 was chosen basing on the previous feedback from > Jon Hunter: > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20240412165407.42163-1-jonath...@nvidia.com/ Patch there seems small/simple enough if it is all it takes for 3.5. Yet, it would be nice to hear from Jon Hunter about the rationale for 3.5 support (if any). > > Minimum versions here also means sticking to features available in said > > versions, for Python just as well as for GCC or any other tool. That's > > not zero cost. > > > > I guess there are two angles here too. The absolute minimum version > > currently required, and the, uh, maximum the minimum version can be > > safely bumped to. Say, you want to use a feature not available in the > > current minimum, how far up can you bump the version to? > > > > Could we define and document the criteria (e.g. based on distros as you > > suggest below) so we don't have to repeat the discussion? Agreed. While we should not bump version randomly, defining a criteria about when we should update the requirement sounds a great idea. For me, the criteria is: - the minimal version shall be at least the minimal one required for the Kernel to build at the most used LTS distros that are not EOL, e. g.: Debian, openSUSE/SUSE, CentOS/RHEL and Ubuntu LTS[1]. [1] In practice, Ubuntu LTS usually has a python version newer than Debian LTS, and CentOS versions are identical to RHEL ones, so I guess checking for Debian, openSUSE, SUSE and RHEL should be enough. Regards, Mauro
