On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 01:18:26PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/14/2025 3:10 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 07:38:16PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 1/5/2025 7:07 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > Move perf mode handling for the bandwidth to
> > > > _dpu_core_perf_crtc_update_bus() rather than overriding per-CRTC data
> > > > and then aggregating known values.
> > > > 
> > > > Note, this changes the fix_core_ab_vote. Previously it would be
> > > > multiplied per the CRTC number, now it will be used directly for
> > > > interconnect voting. This better reflects user requirements in the case
> > > > of different resolutions being set on different CRTCs: instead of using
> > > > the same bandwidth for each CRTC (which is incorrect) user can now
> > > > calculate overall bandwidth required by all outputs and use that value.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > There are two things this change is doing:
> > > 
> > > 1) Dropping the core_clk_rate setting because its already handled inside
> > > _dpu_core_perf_get_core_clk_rate() and hence dpu_core_perf_crtc_update()
> > > will still work.
> > > 
> > > and
> > > 
> > > 2) Then this part of moving the ab/ib setting to
> > > _dpu_core_perf_crtc_update_bus().
> > > 
> > > Can we split this into two changes so that its clear that dropping
> > > core_clk_rate setting in this change will not cause an issue.
> > 
> > Ack
> > 
> 
> Actually I think this is incorrect.
> 
> If the user puts in an incorrect value beyond the bounds, earlier the code
> will reject that by failing the in _dpu_core_perf_calc_crtc().

This function doesn't perform any validation nor returns an error code.
Probably you've meant some other function.

> 
> Now, if we move it to _dpu_core_perf_crtc_update_bus(), this is beyond the
> check phase so incorrect values cannot be rejected.
> 
> So we will still need to preserve overriding the values in
> _dpu_core_perf_calc_crtc().
> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c | 40 
> > > > +++++++++++++--------------
> > > >    1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c 
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> > > > index 
> > > > 70f43e8359caee2082f2ca9944a17a6a20aa3d49..7ff3405c6867556a8dc776783b91f1da6c86ef3f
> > > >  100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> > > > @@ -118,22 +118,9 @@ static void _dpu_core_perf_calc_crtc(const struct 
> > > > dpu_core_perf *core_perf,
> > > >                 return;
> > > >         }
> > > > -       memset(perf, 0, sizeof(struct dpu_core_perf_params));
> > > > -
> > > > -       if (core_perf->perf_tune.mode == DPU_PERF_MODE_MINIMUM) {
> > > > -               perf->bw_ctl = 0;
> > > > -               perf->max_per_pipe_ib = 0;
> > > > -               perf->core_clk_rate = 0;
> > > > -       } else if (core_perf->perf_tune.mode == DPU_PERF_MODE_FIXED) {
> > > > -               perf->bw_ctl = core_perf->fix_core_ab_vote * 1000ULL;
> > > > -               perf->max_per_pipe_ib = core_perf->fix_core_ib_vote;
> > > > -               perf->core_clk_rate = core_perf->fix_core_clk_rate;
> > > > -       } else {
> > > > -               perf->bw_ctl = _dpu_core_perf_calc_bw(perf_cfg, crtc);
> > > > -               perf->max_per_pipe_ib = perf_cfg->min_dram_ib;
> > > > -               perf->core_clk_rate = _dpu_core_perf_calc_clk(perf_cfg, 
> > > > crtc, state);
> > > > -       }
> > > > -
> > > > +       perf->bw_ctl = _dpu_core_perf_calc_bw(perf_cfg, crtc);
> > > > +       perf->max_per_pipe_ib = perf_cfg->min_dram_ib;
> > > > +       perf->core_clk_rate = _dpu_core_perf_calc_clk(perf_cfg, crtc, 
> > > > state);
> > > >         DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
> > > >                 "crtc=%d clk_rate=%llu core_ib=%u core_ab=%u\n",
> > > >                         crtc->base.id, perf->core_clk_rate,
> > > > @@ -222,18 +209,29 @@ static int _dpu_core_perf_crtc_update_bus(struct 
> > > > dpu_kms *kms,
> > > >    {
> > > >         struct dpu_core_perf_params perf = { 0 };
> > > >         int i, ret = 0;
> > > > -       u64 avg_bw;
> > > > +       u32 avg_bw;
> > > > +       u32 peak_bw;
> > > >         if (!kms->num_paths)
> > > >                 return 0;
> > > > -       dpu_core_perf_aggregate(crtc->dev, 
> > > > dpu_crtc_get_client_type(crtc), &perf);
> > > > +       if (kms->perf.perf_tune.mode == DPU_PERF_MODE_MINIMUM) {
> > > > +               avg_bw = 0;
> > > > +               peak_bw = 0;
> > > > +       } else if (kms->perf.perf_tune.mode == DPU_PERF_MODE_FIXED) {
> > > > +               avg_bw = kms->perf.fix_core_ab_vote;
> > > > +               peak_bw = kms->perf.fix_core_ib_vote;
> > > > +       } else {
> > > > +               dpu_core_perf_aggregate(crtc->dev, 
> > > > dpu_crtc_get_client_type(crtc), &perf);
> > > > +
> > > > +               avg_bw = div_u64(perf.bw_ctl, 1000); /*Bps_to_icc*/
> > > > +               peak_bw = perf.max_per_pipe_ib;
> > > > +       }
> > > > -       avg_bw = perf.bw_ctl;
> > > > -       do_div(avg_bw, (kms->num_paths * 1000)); /*Bps_to_icc*/
> > > > +       avg_bw /= kms->num_paths;
> > > >         for (i = 0; i < kms->num_paths; i++)
> > > > -               icc_set_bw(kms->path[i], avg_bw, perf.max_per_pipe_ib);
> > > > +               icc_set_bw(kms->path[i], avg_bw, peak_bw);
> > > >         return ret;
> > > >    }
> > > > 
> > 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to