On 7/13/2026 7:46 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 10:14:38PM +0800, Yongxing Mou wrote:
In MST mode, multiple streams share the same DP link. Track a link_ready
state so msm_dp_display_prepare_link() runs only once per link and
repeated calls are skipped.

Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
index 2a74302bcb7c..d56ee10ee065 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
@@ -702,6 +702,9 @@ int msm_dp_display_prepare_link(struct msm_dp 
*msm_dp_display)
        if (msm_dp_display->is_edp)
                msm_dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp);
+ if (msm_dp_display->link_ready)
+               return 0;
+

What kind of locking is protecting this variable? What prevents it from
being accessed concurrently?

In MST, the entire function is protected by mst_lock, so concurrent access to this variable is serialized.
        rc = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&msm_dp_display->pdev->dev);
        if (rc) {
                DRM_ERROR("failed to pm_runtime_resume\n");
@@ -714,14 +717,18 @@ int msm_dp_display_prepare_link(struct msm_dp 
*msm_dp_display)
        if (!msm_dp_display->active_stream_cnt) {
                msm_dp_display_host_phy_init(dp);
                force_link_train = true;
+
+               rc = msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(dp->ctrl, dp->panel);
+               if (rc)
+                       DRM_ERROR("Failed link training (rc=%d)\n", rc);
+               // TODO: schedule drm_connector_set_link_status_property()
        }
- rc = msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(dp->ctrl, dp->panel);
-       if (rc)
-               DRM_ERROR("Failed link training (rc=%d)\n", rc);
-       // TODO: schedule drm_connector_set_link_status_property()

Why is it being moved now rather than in the patch where
active_stream_cnt was introduced?

Got it. will move to that part
+       rc = msm_dp_ctrl_prepare_stream_on(dp->ctrl, dp->panel, 
force_link_train);
+       if (!rc)
+               msm_dp_display->link_ready = true;
- return msm_dp_ctrl_prepare_stream_on(dp->ctrl, dp->panel, force_link_train);
+       return rc;
  }
static int msm_dp_display_enable(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp,

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
index 676213a48089..0464f8941e8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct msm_dp {
        bool mst_active;
        unsigned int connector_type;
        bool is_edp;
+       bool link_ready;

Please group the status variables together.

Got it.
struct msm_dp_audio *msm_dp_audio;
        bool psr_supported;

--
2.43.0



Reply via email to