-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 08/06/2009 05:53 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 18:25 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> The attached patch addresses ticket #84.
>>> The implementation is unfortunately Linux-specific as it uses the
>>> prctl(2) syscall. Ideas how to accomplish this in a cross-platform
>>> manner are welcome.
>> How do we fork processes?
>> If we just fork and do not daemonize then children should just die
>> (system sends sigterm to children AFAIR) when the parent process exits.
>> At least that is what used to happen in old days on Solaris, HP and AIX.
>> If we fork and then make the process a new process group leader by using
>> setpgrp() then it terns into a service. It PPID becomes 1 (AFAIR - have
>> done it many years ago).
>> If our children are independent processes there is no good way other
>> than pass in the IP of the parent at the initialization and periodically
>> check if the process is still around and its start time is before child's.
>> If the problem we are trying to solve is to exit back ends when monitor
>> dies we should either keep the children as members of the same group or
>> use the periodic check approach.
> I have to say I am a bit surprised about this patch too.
> Last time I put my hands on it we were using process groups exactly so
> that when monitor is killed all other process die as well. In my
> experience this works fine in master. In what cases do this fail ?
> Freeipa-devel mailing list
In the event that the monitor segfaults or is killed with SIGKILL, it
terminates immediately and does not signal the children to exit. That is
what this is meant to address.
Looking to carve out IT costs?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Freeipa-devel mailing list