Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:37 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Now when we decided to use latest DS that is available from 389 project >> for IPA v2 we can take advantage of the syntaxes that DS team has added. >> For example they added numeric syntax that was a part of the original >> DNS schema we planned for IPA. >> I remember we replaced the originally planned syntax with some other >> syntax that is available. >> >> Does it make sense to revert to the numeric syntax now or it is not a >> big deal? >> I am just concerned that once we will decide to do it the original way >> because we would think it is the "right" thing to do and will face all >> sorts of migration issues. >> Ideas? >> > > Unless it is a major amount of work we should use the proper syntax. > Especially for "standard" schema. > > Simo. > > It should not be a big deal IMO so Martin if you are ok with this I would like to ask Pavel to take it as an action item.
-- Thank you, Dmitri Pal Engineering Manager IPA project, Red Hat Inc. ------------------------------- Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel