On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:19:30 -0400
John Dennis <jden...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Simo's 3rd patch has a dependency on this patch. Simo's 3rd patch
> should be reverted. This patch applied, and then Simo should
> regenerate his 3rd patch. By 3rd patch I mean the 3rd patch file in
> the patch submission which was ACK'ed, in other words it's the patch
> which regenerated the pot file and merged all the .po files.

I'll provide a patch that does not require us to do reverts.


Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

Freeipa-devel mailing list

Reply via email to