On 02/28/2012 04:45 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/28/2012 04:02 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/27/2012 05:10 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 09:44 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We are pretty trusting that the data coming out of LDAP matches its
schema but it is possible to stuff non-printable characters into
most
attributes.
I've added a sanity checker to keep a value as a python str type
(treated as binary internally). This will result in a base64
encoded
blob be returned to the client.
Shouldn't you try to parse it as a unicode string and catch
TypeError to
know when to return it as binary ?
Simo.
What we do now is the equivalent of unicode(chr(0)) which returns
u'\x00' and is why we are failing now.
I believe there is a unicode category module, we might be able to use
that if there is a category that defines non-printable characters.
rob
Like this:
import unicodedata
def contains_non_printable(val):
for c in val:
if unicodedata.category(unicode(c)) == 'Cc':
return True
return False
This wouldn't have the exclusion of tab, CR and LF like using ord()
but
is probably more correct.
rob
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
If you're protecting the XML-RPC calls, it'd probably be better to look
at the XML spec directly: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#charsets
Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] |
[#x10000-#x10FFFF]
I'd say this is a good set for CLI as well.
And you can trap invalid UTF-8 sequences by catching the
UnicodeDecodeError from decode().
Replace my ord function with a regex that looks for invalid characters.
Now catching that exception too and leaving as a str type.
rob
You're matching an Unicode regex against a bytestring. It'd be better to
match after the decode.
The unicode regex was force of habit. I purposely do this comparison
before the decoding to save decoding something that is binary. Would it
be acceptable if I just remove the u'?
rob
No: re.search('[\uDFFF]', u'\uDFFF'.encode('utf-8')) --> None
Actually I'm not sure what encoding is used behind the scenes here; I
wouldn't recommend mixing Unicode and bytestrings even if it did work on
my machine.
Also, match() only looks at the beginning of the string; use search().
Sorry for not catching that earlier.
OCD notes:
- the "matches" variable name is misleading, there's either one match or
None.
- use `is not None` instead of `!= None` as per PEP8.
- The contains_non_printable method seems a bit excessive now that it
essentially just contains one call. Unless it's meant to be subclassed,
in which case the docstring should probably look different.
--
Petr³
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
