On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 11:10 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 09:32 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 23:49 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>> Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:14 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:25 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>>>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>>>>>> This set of patches handles enabling psearch both for new 
> >>>>>>> installations
> >>>>>>> (patch 263) and upgraded IPA servers.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For upgraded IPA servers I needed to make sure that psearch is not
> >>>>>>> enabled for every IPA package update, but at most once, when a user
> >>>>>>> updates to IPA with this patch for the first time (patch 264). This is
> >>>>>>> enabled by a new State store located in /var/lib/ipa/sysupgrade (patch
> >>>>>>> 262).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I also improved the way we handled SELinux sebool updates (patch 265),
> >>>>>>> this can make ipa-upgradeconfig to finish in 0.4 seconds and not in 
> >>>>>>> 150
> >>>>>>> seconds as previously. Details are in the patches.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Martin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 262:
> >>>>>> The sysupgrade directory isn't created by the RPM install:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_localstatedir}/cache/ipa/sysupgrade
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fixed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 263:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It looks like zone_refresh is simply disabled in bindinstance.py, why
> >>>>>> not remove it completely?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> zone_refresh is used by bindinstance.py. ipa-server-install or
> >>>>> ipa-dns-install may be configured to use zone refresh instead of
> >>>>> persistent search mechanism to update the zones (e.g. --zone-refresh
> >>>>> 30).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 264:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Small nit, worth doing case-insensitive compare of psearch enabled 
> >>>>>> status?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Petr2 told me that arg value for boolean configuration option is
> >>>>> case-insensitive, so we can do that - fixed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We're updating named.conf in place so I don't know that we need to 
> >>>>>> reset
> >>>>>> permissions. It at least shouldn't get modified by the write.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Right, I was being too defensive. I removed the check.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I made the upgrade more robust, now it won't crash for example when
> >>>>> named.conf does not exist. I also made sure the upgrade script works
> >>>>> correctly when the IPA is configured without DNS.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Martin
> >>>>
> >>>> I rebased the patches for current master. I also slightly reworked patch
> >>>> 265, the error message printed in case of an unsuccessful setsebool was
> >>>> not printed right.
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> Trailing whitespace in 264:
> >>>
> >>> # git am /tmp/freeipa-mkosek-264-3-enable-psearch-on-upgrades.patch
> >>> Applying: Enable psearch on upgrades
> >>> /home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa-nossh/.git/rebase-apply/patch:108: trailing
> >>> whitespace.
> >>>                       root_logger.error('Cannot update connections in %s:
> >>> %s',
> >>> warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
> >>
> >> Fixed.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I don't think the DNS detection is adequate in 264, testing for
> >>> named.conf is not enough. What if someone is running a non-IPA DNS
> >>> server on the box?
> >>
> >> I assume you are referring to this line:
> >> +    if not bindinstance.named_conf_exists():
> >>
> >> It checks both if the named.conf exists + if it has bind-dyndb-ldap
> >> configured for IPA:
> >>          if line.startswith('dynamic-db "ipa"'):
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I know that I've recently done similar config changes but in 265 is
> >>> using line.startswith() going to be fragile?
> >>
> >> I assume you mean patch 264. This should be OK - user would need to mess
> >> with the configuration generated by our install scripts to break it. But
> >> in this case, other regex-es would fail too. I did not want to get too
> >> wild with regex-es to keep it simple and safe. The worst case scenario
> >> should be that named.conf is not updated and psearch is not turned on.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> In 266 I'd merge in the ipa-upgradeconfig change into 265 or some other
> >>> patch.
> >>
> >> I assume you mean patch 265. I had this change moved to 264 right after
> >> I sent the patches :-)
> >>
> >>>
> >>> In the 'for setting, state' loop should it be catching a
> >>> CalledProcessException rather than raw Exception? I think that is all
> >>> that should be raised there.
> >>
> >> Right, fixed.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I did an upgrade and it seemed to work ok, ended up with these scary
> >>> messages in /var/log/messages:
> >>>
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost named[18753]: LDAP error: Can't contact LDAP
> >>> server
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost named[18753]: connection to the LDAP server
> >>> was lost
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost named[18753]: bind to LDAP server failed:
> >>> Can't contact LDAP server
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost named[18753]: ldap_psearch_watcher failed to
> >>> handle LDAP connection error. Reconnection in 60s
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost named[18753]: LDAP error: Can't contact LDAP
> >>> server
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost named[18753]: connection to the LDAP server
> >>> was lost
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost named[18753]: bind to LDAP server failed:
> >>> Can't contact LDAP server
> >>> Jun  4 23:39:17 localhost ns-slapd[18798]: [04/Jun/2012:23:39:17 -0400]
> >>> - Information: Non-Secure Port Disabled
> >>> Jun  4 23:40:17 localhost named[18753]: handle_connection_error failed
> >>> to obtain ldap error code
> >>> Jun  4 23:40:17 localhost named[18753]: connection to the LDAP server
> >>> was lost
> >>> Jun  4 23:40:17 localhost named[18753]: bind to LDAP server failed:
> >>> Can't contact LDAP server
> >>> Jun  4 23:40:17 localhost named[18753]: ldap_psearch_watcher failed to
> >>> handle LDAP connection error. Reconnection in 60s
> >>> Jun  4 23:41:17 localhost named[18753]: handle_connection_error failed
> >>> to obtain ldap error code
> >>> Jun  4 23:41:17 localhost named[18753]: connection to the LDAP server
> >>> was lost
> >>>
> >>> DNS does seem to be working fine from the cli.
> >>
> >> I think this was caused by ipa-ldap-updater which shut down the
> >> Directory Server to perform the LDAP upgrade.
> >>
> >> Btw I asked Petr to file a ticket for bind-dyndb-ldap to report when it
> >> report success after when it returns back from an error state:
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/bind-dyndb-ldap/ticket/71
> >> This way, we cannot know that the LDAP connection has been restored
> >> besides doing a test DNS query.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> The tests are another matter. named crashed in 0:1.1.0-0.10.b2.fc17 in
> >>> the test cleanup.
> >>>
> >>> I upgraded to bind-dyndb-ldap-1.1.0-0.11.rc1.fc17 and got this stack 
> >>> trace:
> >>>
> >>> Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> >>> [Switching to Thread 0x7f68e50db700 (LWP 19367)]
> >>> 0x00007f68e6188915 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> (gdb) where
> >>> #0  0x00007f68e6188915 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #1  0x00007f68e618a0c8 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>> #2  0x00007f68e91171fb in assertion_failed (file=<optimized out>,
> >>>       line=<optimized out>, type=<optimized out>, cond=<optimized out>)
> >>>       at ./main.c:219
> >>> #3  0x00007f68e73a6c3a in isc_assertion_failed (
> >>>       file=file@entry=0x7f68e8a82deb "zone.c", line=<optimized out>,
> >>>       type=type@entry=isc_assertiontype_require,
> >>>       cond=cond@entry=0x7f68e8a82fe7 "zone->db != ((void *)0)")
> >>>       at assertions.c:57
> >>> #4  0x00007f68e8a2ba67 in zone_detachdb (zone=<optimized out>) at
> >>> zone.c:12944
> >>> #5  zone_detachdb (zone=0x7f68dc57fef0) at zone.c:12943
> >>> #6  0x00007f68e8a2baa1 in zone_unload (zone=zone@entry=0x7f68dc57fef0)
> >>>       at zone.c:9092
> >>> #7  0x00007f68e8a2fcc4 in dns_zone_unload (zone=0x7f68dc57fef0) at
> >>> zone.c:9040
> >>> #8  0x00007f68e3584b9e in ldap_delete_zone2
> >>> (inst=inst@entry=0x7f68e90b0f10,
> >>>       name=name@entry=0x7f68e50dad10, lock=lock@entry=isc_boolean_true)
> >>>       at ldap_helper.c:786
> >>> #9  0x00007f68e3586554 in ldap_delete_zone (dn=<optimized out>,
> >>>       inst=0x7f68e90b0f10, lock=<optimized out>) at ldap_helper.c:811
> >>> #10 update_action (task=<optimized out>, event=0x7f68e37de6a0)
> >>>       at ldap_helper.c:2763
> >>> #11 0x00007f68e73c613e in dispatch (manager=0x7f68e908f010) at task.c:1109
> >>> #12 run (uap=0x7f68e908f010) at task.c:1279
> >>> #13 0x00007f68e6d7bd14 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #14 0x00007f68e624494d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>>
> >>> rob
> >>
> >> Thanks for digging out the traceback, I already reported this error to
> >> bind-dyndb-ldap:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827401
> >>
> >> Petr, what's the status of this bug? I guess we cannot push this set of
> >> patches to enable the psearch by default until this is fixed. Otherwise
> >> bind-dyndb-ldap would crash _every_ DNS unit test case.
> >>
> >> Updated set of patches attached.
> >>
> >> Martin
> >
> > Petr^2 fixed the bug in bind-dyndb-ldap causing it to crash during DNS
> > unit tests. A re-tested the new version with IPA and it worked fine.
> >
> > Attached a rebased set of patches with proper bind-dyndb-ldap version
> > enforced. I would like this to get acked soon so that psearch is tested
> > by a broader audience and we are able to stabilize it faster.
> >
> > Martin
> 
> These work ok so conditional ACK based on the following:
> 
> The tests all pass but I saw this in messages:
> 
> Jun  8 10:13:37 localhost named[1624]: psearch moddn change is not 
> implemented
> Jun  8 10:13:37 localhost named[1624]: psearch_update failed for 
> idnsname=testdnsres-renamed,idnsname=dnszone.test,cn=dns,dc=example,dc=com 
> zone. Zone can be outdated, run `rndc reload`

Yup, there is already a ticket which should fix that:
https://fedorahosted.org/bind-dyndb-ldap/ticket/72

> 
> Other than immediately seeing new zones are there any other consequences 
> to disabling psearch? Are features eventually going to not be available 
> if it is not enabled? I assume that if/when that happens the man page 
> will be updated at that point?
> 
> rob

At current state of things, both modes (psearch vs. no-psearch) should
equivalent in term of features. In the future, DNSSEC+automatic SOA
update (i.e. a requirement for zone transfers) will depend on psearch.

I guess it would be possible to implement some limited functionality
when psearch is off, we can discuss this topic with Petr/Adam.

Martin

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to