On 08/15/2012 03:54 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:24 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 08/08/2012 10:05 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
>>> Hi, 
>>>
>>> Dogtag 10 is being released on f18, and has a number of changes that
>>> will affect IPA.  In particular, the following changes will affect
>>> current IPA code. 
>>>
>>> * The directory layout of the dogtag instance has changed.  Instead of
>>> using separate tomcat instances to host different subsystems, the
>>> standard dogtag installation will allow one to install a CA. KRA, OCSP
>>> and TKS within the same instance.  There have been corresponding changes
>>> in the directory layout, as well as the default instance name
>>> (pki-tomcat instead of pki-ca), and startup daemon (pki-tomcatd, instead
>>> of pki-cad, pki-krad etc.) 
>>>
>>> * The default instance will use only four ports (HTTPS, HTTP, AJP and
>>> tomcat shutdown port) rather than the 6 previously used.  The default
>>> ports will be changed to the standard tomcat ports.  As these ports are
>>> local to the ipa server machine, this should not cause too much
>>> disruption. 
>>>
>>> * There is a new single step installer written in python.
>>> (pkispawn/destroy) vs. pkicreate/pkisilent/pkiremove.
>>>
>>> * Dogtag 10 runs on tomcat7 - with a new corresponding version of
>>> tomcatjss.
>>>
>>> The attached patch integrates all the above changes in IPA installation
>>> and maintenance code.  Once the patch is applied, users will be able to:
>>>
>>> 1. run ipa-server-install to completion on f18 with dogtag 10.
>>> 2. install a new replica on f18 on dogtag 10.
>>> 3. upgrade an f17 machine with an existing IPA instance to f18/ dogtag
>>> 10 - and have that old-style dogtag instance continue to run correctly.
>>> This will require the installation of the latest version of tomcatjss as
>>> well as the installation of tomcat6.  The old-style instance will
>>> continue to use tomcat6.
>>> 4. in addition, the new cert renewal code has been patched and should
>>> continue to work.
>>>
>>> What is not yet completed / supported:
>>>
>>> 1. Installation with an external CA is not yet completed in the new
>>> installer.  We plan to complete this soon.
>>>
>>> 2. There is some IPA upgrade code that has not yet been touched
>>> (install/tools/ipa-upgradeconfig).
>>>
>>> 3. A script needs to be written to allow admins to convert their
>>> old-style dogtag instances to new style instances, as well as code to
>>> periodically prompt admins to do this.
>>>
>>> 4. Installation of old-style instances using pkicreate/pkisilent on
>>> dogtag 10 will no longer be supported, and will be disabled soon.
>>>
>>> 5.  The pki-selinux policy has been updated to reflect these changes,
>>> but is still in flux.  In fact, it is our intention to place the dogtag
>>> selinux policy in the base selinux policy for f18.  In the meantime, it
>>> may be necessary to run installs in permissive mode.
>>>
>>> The dogtag 10 code will be released shortly into f18.  Prior to that
>>> though, we have placed the new dogtag 10 and tomcatjss code in a
>>> developer repo that is located at 
>>> http://nkinder.fedorapeople.org/dogtag-devel/
>>>
>>> Testing can be done on both f18 and f17 - although the target platform -
>>> and the only platform for which official builds will be created is f18.
>>>
>>> Thanks, 
>>> Ade
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ade,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, I started with review and integration tests (currently
>> running on Fedora 17 with Nathan's repo).
>>
>> Installation on single master was smooth, it worked just fine, even with
>> enforced SELinux, without any error - kudos to you and the whole dogtag team.
>> The resulting logs and the structure of your log directory seems improved. I
>> believe that the brand new Python installers will make it easier to debug
>> issues with dogtag installation when they come.  When I tried our unit tests 
>> or
>> some simple cert operation, it worked fine as well.
>>
>> Now the bad news, or rather few issues and suggestions I found:
>>
>> 1) As we already discussed on IRC, tomcat 7 was not pulled automatically on
>> Fedora 17 when I updated pki-ca, you somewhere miss a Requires.
>>
> We have a dogtag patch that is currently in review that will address
> this.  Once this is in, tomcatjss >=7.0.0 will be required for f17+,
> rather than f18+
> 
>> 2) I had installed IPA with dogtag10 on master. However, CA installation on a
>> replica (ipa-ca-install) with dogtag9 failed - is this expectable?
>>
> Yes.  The current IPA patch is designed to work with dogtag 10 only,
> which will be officially available on f18+.  So if you update to dogtag
> 10, you must have this patch and visa versa.  We probably need to add
> the relevant requires to IPA to enforce this.
> 
> If you have an existing dogtag 9 instance, and you upgrade to the new
> dogtag 10 and patched IPA, then that instance will continue to work.
> But any new instances would be created using dogtag 10.
> 
>> 3) I had installed IPA with dogtag10 on master. Replica had dogtag10 as well
>> and I got the following error:
>>
>> # ipa-ca-install /home/mkosek/replica-info-vm-114.idm.lab.bos.redhat.com.gpg
>> ...
>> Configuring certificate server: Estimated time 3 minutes 30 seconds
>>   [1/14]: creating certificate server user
>>   [2/14]: configuring certificate server instance
>>
>> Your system may be partly configured.
>> Run /usr/sbin/ipa-server-install --uninstall to clean up.
>>
>> Unexpected error - see /var/log/ipareplica-ca-install.log for details:
>> IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
>> '/var/lib/pki/pki-tomcat/alias/ca_backup_keys.p12'
>>
>> Root cause:
>> ...
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ipaserver/install/cainstance.py", 
>> line
>> 625, in __spawn_instance
>>     "/root/cacert.p12")
>> ...
>>
> I need to look into this.  I had fixed ipa-replica-install, rather than
> ipa-ca-install to create replicas.  I didn't know ipa-ca-install
> existed!  Should not be too bad to fix though - most likely just need to
> move files to the right place.

Ok, thanks! Btw. CA on replica can be either installed during
ipa-replica-install time (when --setup-ca option is passed, you probably used
that one) and the aforementioned ipa-ca-install run after ipa-replica-install.

> 
>> 4) What ports does replica need to be open on the master when installing a 
>> CA?
>> Currently, ipa-replica-conncheck does a port check and checks only for 7389,
>> i.e. a port of backend LDAP instance for CA.
>>
> Well, right now - the ports required are 80,443 (to get to the CA) and
> 7389  (for the backend LDAP of the CA).  Later, when I submit the patch
> to merge the CA and IPA databases, the ldap port required will be 389.


Then it is OK, these all ports are already covered in ipa-replica-conncheck.

> 
>>
>> Now to the patch itself.
>>
>> 5) The patch needs a rebase
>>
> Yup - will rebase in my next submission.
> 
>> 6) The patch itself looks and works fine (with the issues I wrote above), but
>> there is currently a lot of hard-coded file paths, instance names or ports. I
>> think it would be really great to move most of this to the platform code
>> (ipapython/platform/). I think that ideal solution would allow us to choose 
>> if
>> we want to build FreeIPA with dogtag9 or dogtag10 environment in a build 
>> time.
>>
>> I am not saying that it is something you would need to do, its just a 
>> proposal
>> also for other developers. This step would enable us to:
>> a) Consolidate CA ports, file paths, instance names etc. to one place
>> b) Easily build IPA to non-Fedora platforms where we still need to use 
>> dogtag9
>>
> 
> This is a great idea.  The hard-coded paths etc. are all following the
> conventions that were already present.  I think you should open a ticket
> for this - and we should address this in a separate patch.

I will let other developers comment on this proposal, if we get some agreement,
I will open a ticket.

I have also found 2 more issues:

7) pki-deploy package does not require any other pki-* package, this does not
look ok. This way I was able to have pki-ca-9.* and pki-deploy-10.* installed
at one time. I doubt it would work that way.

8) Did you test upgrade from installed IPA+dogtag9 to patchedIPA+dogtag10? I
did that on Fedora 17 and pki-ca did not start after upgrade. Attaching logs my
VM after I tried to (re)start pki-ca.

Martin

Attachment: pki-ca-log.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to