On 04/02/2013 12:12 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 11:57 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
>> On 03/11/2013 10:26 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 03/06/2013 01:07 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>> On 6.3.2013 09:32, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>>>> + error=u'CNAME record is not allowed to coexist with any
>>>>> other record'),
>>>> Sorry for nitpicking again, but I would add note '(RFC 1034, section
>>>> Thank you!
>>> Freeipa-devel mailing list
>> Patches 379 and 380 need rebasing.
>> Ana Krivokapic
>> Associate Software Engineer
>> FreeIPA team
>> Red Hat Inc.
> Rebased patches attached.
The first patch (schema update) correctly changes both CNAME and DNAME
attributes to single valued attributes.
I tested the newly introduced validation rules, trying to add:
* more than 1 cname record with the same name
* cname + ptr
* cname + dname
* cname + any other record
* more than 1 dname
* dname + ns
* dname + ns (root zone)
As expected, validation fails for all the above cases except the last
one (dname + ns in the root zone).
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
Freeipa-devel mailing list