On 04/02/2013 12:12 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 11:57 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
>> On 03/11/2013 10:26 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 03/06/2013 01:07 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>> On 6.3.2013 09:32, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>>>> +                error=u'CNAME record is not allowed to coexist with any
>>>>> other record'),
>>>> Sorry for nitpicking again, but I would add note '(RFC 1034, section 
>>>> 3.6.2)'.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freeipa-devel mailing list
>>> Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
>> Patches 379 and 380 need rebasing.
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ana Krivokapic
>> Associate Software Engineer
>> FreeIPA team
>> Red Hat Inc.
>>
> Rebased patches attached.
>
> Martin

The first patch (schema update) correctly changes both CNAME and DNAME
attributes to single valued attributes.

I tested the newly introduced validation rules, trying to add:
 * more than 1 cname record with the same name
 * cname + ptr
 * cname + dname
 * cname + any other record
 * more than 1 dname
 * dname + ns
 * dname + ns (root zone)

As expected, validation fails for all the above cases except the last
one (dname + ns in the root zone).

ACK

-- 
Regards,

Ana Krivokapic
Associate Software Engineer
FreeIPA team
Red Hat Inc.

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to