On 07/11/2013 05:03 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
>> On 07/11/2013 11:38 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
>>>>> On 07/08/2013 08:32 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Attached patches fix systemd and ipactl related bugs:
>>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3730
>>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3729
>>>>>> NACK. For me upgrade case fails (rpm -Uhv), dirsrv didn't restart on
>>>>>> upgrade properly and everything else has failed afterwards.
>>>>> This was caused due to 'systemctl is-active' returning exit status 3
>>>>> ('activating'), and our code treating the non-zero exit status as a
>>>>> failure. I
>>>>> handled this case in the updated patch.
>>>>> As for the ipa.service and dependency ordering, I have done some further
>>>>> testing
>>>>> and found out the adding the '--ignore-dependencies' switch alone solves 
>>>>> the
>>>>> shutdown issue. So I think that no modification of ipa.service file is
>>>>> necessary.
>>>>> Updated patches are attached.
>>>> This is much better. However, 'ipactl stop' doesn't stop ns-slapd and
>>>> dogtag:
>>> What's important is the fact that now I can issue reboot and VM
>>> restarts, not hangs, and then IPA starts properly on boot -- this is
>>> because when ns-slapd gets a signal from systemd, it automatically shuts
>>> itself down properly and the same happens to dogtag. This is good
>>> enough so that I push current patches to master but please proceed on
>>> fixing 'ipactl stop' issue.
>> Thanks for catching that. I am attaching a patch which should solve this 
>> issue.
> Works now, I tried stop/start/restart, all processes were properly addressed.
> Thanks!

Is that an ACK? If yes, please push the patches :-)


Freeipa-devel mailing list

Reply via email to