On 09/26/2013 02:28 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 12:20 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>> On 26.9.2013 10:28, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Provides two new options for the ipa-client-install:
>>>      --nisdomain: specifies the NIS domain name
>>>      --no_nisdomain: flag to aviod setting the NIS domain name
>>>
>>> In case no --nisdomain is specified and --no_nisdomain flag was
>>> not set, the IPA domain is used.
>>>
>>> Manual pages updated.
>>>
>>> http://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3202
>>>
>>> Design page:
>>>
>>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/V3_Minor_Enhancements
>>>
>>
>> Is the --no-nisdomain option necessary? IMO --nisdomain with empty value
>> (i.e. "--nisdomain=" or "--nisdomain ''") should be sufficient for this.
>>
>> Honza
>>
> 
> I just found --no-nisdomain more descriptive and explicit. If there is a
> consensus, I can remove it.
> 

I am not aware of any precedent that would warrant --nisdomain="".

IMO --no-nisdomain is more consistent with rest of the options.

Martin

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to