On 09/26/2013 02:45 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote: > On 26.9.2013 14:38, Martin Kosek wrote: >> On 09/26/2013 02:28 PM, Tomas Babej wrote: >>> On 09/26/2013 12:20 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote: ... >>> I just found --no-nisdomain more descriptive and explicit. If there is a >>> consensus, I can remove it. >>> >> >> I am not aware of any precedent that would warrant --nisdomain="". > > I have seen concerns about the number of ipa-client-install options in the > past > (not by me).
IMHO, we are currently OK on this front. Having options categorized in sections, as we already do, helps. >> IMO --no-nisdomain is more consistent with rest of the options. > > I don't see any other --<option>=<value> and --no-<option> option pair in > ipa-client-install, so what consistency are you talking about? I was referring to --no-ssh, --no-ntp and similar. But it is true that these rather disable entire features than delete a value. I do not punt on this, --nidomain="" may be OK as well. Martin _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
