On 09/26/2013 02:45 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 26.9.2013 14:38, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/26/2013 02:28 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2013 12:20 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> I just found --no-nisdomain more descriptive and explicit. If there is a
>>> consensus, I can remove it.
>> I am not aware of any precedent that would warrant --nisdomain="".
> I have seen concerns about the number of ipa-client-install options in the 
> past
> (not by me).

IMHO, we are currently OK on this front. Having options categorized in
sections, as we already do, helps.

>> IMO --no-nisdomain is more consistent with rest of the options.
> I don't see any other --<option>=<value> and --no-<option> option pair in
> ipa-client-install, so what consistency are you talking about?

I was referring to --no-ssh, --no-ntp and similar. But it is true that these
rather disable entire features than delete a value. I do not punt on this,
--nidomain="" may be OK as well.


Freeipa-devel mailing list

Reply via email to