On 10/21/2013 09:49 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 08:33 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 21.10.2013 01:42, Nathan Kinder wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 01:33 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>> I was searching for a ticket in the depth of the backlog when I found
>>>> some tickets we should probably just close as they are not relevant
>>>> anymore or have been superseded by alternative implementations.
>>>>
>>>> If nobody objects I'd like to close the follwing tickets:
>>>>
>>>> #582 - simply old and no more relevant
> +1
>
>>>> #232 - superseded by #3859 (or reference from #3859 ?)
>>>> #233 - superseded by #3859 (or reference from #3859 ?)
> I would rather close the old ones and refer to the new ticket, just for the
> case of easier ticket manipupation.
>
>>>> #192 - it seem we settled, do we still want to do this ?
>>> I don't think that there a big need to do this anymore.  We've added more 
>>> and
>>> more capabilities to the FreeIPA password plug-in over time. In some ways,
>>> it's nice to have a separate password plug-in since  just for FreeIPA as 
>>> we've
>>> added all of these other capabilities that are really FreeIPA specific (such
>>> as OTP).  If we wanted to leverage a 389 DS password policy plug-in that 
>>> also
>>> allows us to plug-in all of these other password related capabilities, the
>>> (not yet developed) 389 DS password policy API might have to be fairly 
>>> complex.
> +1
>
>>>> #191 - cryptic, do we still want to do something here ?
>> Are we speaking about Web UI, right? IMHO a search capability is necessary if
>> you have thousands of users. You simply can't use paging to find a 1 user 
>> from
>> 10 000. (This assumes that people with 10 000 users use Web UI...)
> I would not close this one, I think it could prove useful in future. 
> Currently,
> Web UI cannot search only on a specific user entry, AFAIR.
>
>>>> #126 - I think we should close WONTFIX
>> I agree. We have how-to for people who insist on chroot.
> +1
>
>>>> #908 - I do not think we care much for the openssl dependency anymore
>>>> #2133 - superseded by #3007
>>> Agreed.
> Ok.
>
> Thanks for the archeological work you did, Simo.
>
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipa-devel mailing list
> Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Found another one:

#2766 - superseeded by #3797

-- 
Regards,

Ana Krivokapic
Associate Software Engineer
FreeIPA team
Red Hat Inc.

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to