On 5.12.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:29 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 5.12.2013 14:09, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 12/03/2013 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Some tags escaped the relicensing we did a long time ago.

Simo.

Looks good, ACK, pushed to:
master: af26e6da4650b3a429af31bc38b546eff27e38c6
ipa-3-3: 9defb913aa65bfe9b423d510f340ae23b9e547f2



I grepped for some other occurences of "GPLv2":

contrib/RHEL4/ipa-client.spec:7:License:        GPLv2
do we still want to carry the RHEL4 stuff anyway?

ipa-client/ipa-client.spec.in:7:License:        GPLv2
Is ipa-client.spec used for anything any more?


install/ui/src/freeipa/package.json:
      "licenses": [{
          "type": "GPLv3",
          "url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html";
      },{
          "type": "GPLv2",
          "url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html";
      }],
Is this package dual-licensed?


It's because of:
   git grep "Free Software Foundation; version 2"
install/ui/src/freeipa/aci.js: * published by the Free Software
Foundation; version 2 only
install/ui/test/aci_tests.js: * published by the Free Software
Foundation; version 2 only
install/ui/test/widget_tests.js: * published by the Free Software
Foundation; version 2 only


It's most likely a mistake and should be changed.

Is that code really v2 only ?

Or are you saying the "version 2 only" strings are mistakes ?

Simo.


It's our code. So IMO we should just change it to v3.

--
Petr Vobornik

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to