On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 12/16/2013 08:07 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello list,

we have to decide what we will do with 389-ds-base package in Fedora 20.

Currently, we know about following problems:

Schema problems:
  https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47631 (regression)

Fixed.


Referential Integrity:
  https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47621 (new functionality)
  https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47624 (regression)
Fixed.

Replication:
  https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47632 (?)

Cannot reproduce.  Closed as WORKSFORME.


Stability:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732
Fixed.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47629 (we are not sure if the syncrepl really plays some role or not)

We are still trying to determine the cause, and if this is related to the use of syncrepl. If it turns out to be related to syncrepl, I would like to release 1.3.2.9 in F20, and just disable the use of syncrepl in 389 clients.

Is everyone ok with this?
Fine for me. Once you get update out, we can issue FreeIPA update that
requires new 389-ds-base and slapi-nis (slapi-nis was already released
so we cannot combine all three packages in the same update).

--
/ Alexander Bokovoy

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to