On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 15:16 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 12/20/2013 03:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 14:59 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > >> On 12/20/2013 02:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:22 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > >>>> On 12/19/2013 10:24 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>>>> I have been looking at how we deal with krbpwdpolicypreference as we > >>>>> found issues with AD synced users, which get no password policy :/ > >>>>> > >>>>> I found out that we do not rely on CoS anymore for setting the attribute > >>>>> (origin of this bug I would guess), but instead explicitly set the > >>>>> policy on user objects. > >>>>> > >>>>> Why is that ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Also I still see in bootstrap-template.ldif that we create a Password > >>>>> Policy object in cn=accounts in theory, but I do not have this object on > >>>>> my server, what happens to it, what removes it ? Why ? > >>>> > >>>> I don't see it in any update file. Was your server installed before this > >>>> was added (2009-10-02)? > >>> > >>> Actually it is indeed possible, but then why there was no update file > >>> with the change ? > >> > >> Maybe Rob can tell us a reason. It was added in commit dac224c2. > >> Most likely it's a bug, please file a ticket. > > > > Ok, anyway this part was not interesting, I am more interested in why we > > explicitly add krbpwdpolicypreference to the user object and do not use > > CoS for the default ? > > I found some discussion at https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/51. > For further questions I guess you'll need to wait for Rob.
Alexander found the commit, and had a pretty explanatory message. I opened a bug because the reason that prompted that change is actually no more. We'll discuss after the holidays break how to best address the whole issue. Thanks for digging up stuff :) Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel