On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:13 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: > This, I believe, has already been covered, but I'm concerned with the > (over)use of active/inactive in this discussion. > > I think use of "inactive" and "active" to describe users might be > confusing since there is already an account enable/disable command. > This > on top of unlock, are there now 3 possible boolean states a user can > be > in? locked/unlocked, enabled/disabled, active/inactive, plus > deleted/active and staged/active? > Agree, we should only have "ipa user-unstage <username>" and not call this operations with words like active/inactive.
User's in the staging area are not inactive, they are *not* users yet in the first place. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipafirstname.lastname@example.org https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel